Bookmark Material

by Brian Enigma on April 7, 2009 8:40pm

in Dear Diary,Links,Portland

I started to write a com­ment to the post Fear of (book­mark) com­mit­ment? Try I Need to Read This over on Sil­i­con Florist, but what I found myself writ­ing started get­ting longer and longer and I real­ized I might be bet­ter off shar­ing as a fully hyper­linked blog post.

Rick talks about tem­porar­ily book­mark­ing arti­cles for return­ing to later.  You prob­a­bly know the sort of thing: a long, but inter­est­ing look­ing arti­cle on Digg’s home­page that you do not cur­rently have time for, some cool video that a friend Twit­ters, a link to a pos­si­bly NSFW pic­ture via IM that you’d rather not chance look­ing at now.  They are all links you want to get back to (after work, when the boss isn’t around, or on a higher band­width con­nec­tion), but they are not nec­es­sar­ily links you want to keep for­ever and ever.

He goes on to intro­duce a Portland-based ser­vice (yeay, Port­land!) called I Need To Read This that fits that situation.

One par­tic­u­lar quote in the arti­cle jumps out at me:

In short, you can’t com­mit to sav­ing it to your book­marks because you’re not sure if it’s book­mark mate­r­ial, yet.

I am not sure I agree with this state­ment.  It sounds like I Need To Read This is a great ser­vice and I do not want to be the neg­a­tive get-offa-my-lawn guy, but I have been doing this tem­po­rary link sav­ing for years with noth­ing more than book­marks and a plu­g­ins I already use.  Here’s my secret: every­thing is book­mark mate­r­ial.  Or, at the very least, every­thing has book­mark poten­tial.

I have one spe­cial book­mark folder in my Fire­fox tool­bar called To Review.  Any­thing that looks inter­est­ing, but I do not have the time to read (or oth­er­wise am not in a sit­u­a­tion in which read­ing is advised), I add as a book­mark in the To Review folder.  All of the other book­marks and book­mark fold­ers are, as Rick says, “book­mark mate­r­ial.”  This one folder is the wild­card anything-goes folder.  To look at it like email, this is my inbox.  Book­marks can be deleted, Dugg, archived into other book­mark fold­ers, and what­not.  I even try to use the Inbox Zero method­ol­ogy against this folder so that its size does not get out of control.

The To Review folder is only half of the equa­tion.  If you are the sort of per­son who only uses one browser on one com­puter (i.e. you carry your lap­top every­where or only do com­puter work in a home office), you’re done.  You can stop read­ing here because every­thing you need is covered.

I hap­pen to be in a sit­u­a­tion where I have a Linux box at work, a Mac lap­top, and a Mac desk­top.  I end up hav­ing to syn­chro­nize my book­marks because of this.  I want my quick-search book­marks to always be around (i.e. “pow harry pot­ter” in the URL bar searches Powell’s for Harry Pot­ter books.) I want links to research required by my cur­rent work and per­sonal projects at hand.  For me, syn­chro­niz­ing is a given.  I guess I could be using Deli­cious — and do use it for really-really long-term book­marks — but I don’t use it for daily or secure stuff.  Per­son­ally, I use Fox­marks (soon to be Xmarks) because I’m a Fire­fox guy that has to go across oper­at­ing sys­tems.  Fox­marks makes sure that my To Review folder (as well as all other book­marks) stays in sync between all machines.  With this method, any­thing that shows up on an RSS feed at work that looks inter­est­ing but too in-depth to cover in a cof­fee break gets book­marked and synced for when I get home.  This is the syn­chro­nizer I hap­pen to use, but there are plenty out there.

A recent added bonus to Foxmarks/Xmarks is the new Safari plu­gin.  This syn­chro­nizes Fox­marks with Safari — and more impor­tantly, the iPhone.  It used to be that I had to go to a spe­cial myfox­marks web­site on the iPhone to get to these links, but now they sync as local book­marks.  It is also nice to still have the option to go to myfox­marks if I have not synced in a lit­tle while.

So that is my method of mark­ing things to read for later.  I can­not say “it doesn’t require a spe­cial plu­gin or book­marklet” because it does.  It just doesn’t require a spe­cial plu­gin beyond those that I already need to use for other pur­poses.  And get off my lawn!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati

If you liked this post, you may also enjoy:

  1. Am I going to have to write my own news reader?
  2. Books
  3. Ignite Port­land 4
  4. Anathem & other great books I’m not reading
  5. iPhoto books are cool

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Foo2rama April 7, 2009 at 9:57 pm

I run 2x delicious accounts, one is private and one is public. that seems to work best for me. It is a small hassle to log in and out I will admit, I will have to try some of your solutions. Fox marks looks interesting.

Reply

2 rob April 8, 2009 at 10:29 am

I use delicious personally. It has a ‘Do not Share’ feature… is that not secure enough?

Reply

3 brian April 8, 2009 at 4:50 pm

The last time I really looked into Delicious for something like this, there was no “do not share” feature. Additionally, the Firefox plugin for Delicious kept trying to commit lots of local bookmarks I didn’t want online — you know, like links related to secret work projects and my collection of amputee midget clown porn website links. Come to think of it, I’ve noticed the “do not share” checkbox since then, but never spent the time to try it out. I’ll have to experiment with that.

Reply

4 brian April 9, 2009 at 11:30 am

…and in thinking about it a day later, it feels like the “do not share” is more of a duct-tape feature. After all, the whole spirit of the site is a SOCIAL BOOKMARKING service and private bookmarks kind of subvert that purpose. I have it ingrained in my thinking that Delicious is for sharing links with friends. That’s why I subscribe to the RSS of my friends’ bookmarks. Putting things in there that are either private or are questionable noteworthiness (as in my “To Review” folder) just doesn’t jive with the way I think about the service. Maybe my interpretation of Delicious is wrong, maybe not. Either way, that’s how I tend to use the service.

Reply

5 Bookmarking May 5, 2009 at 5:46 pm

In a social bookmarking system, users save links to web pages that they want to remember and/or share. These bookmarks are usually public, and can be saved privately, shared only with specified people or groups, shared only inside certain networks, or another combination of public and private domains. The allowed people can usually view these bookmarks chronologically, by category or tags, or via a search engine.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: